Top 10 Time Tracking Software: Features, Pros, Cons and Comparison

---

Introduction

Time tracking software helps individuals and teams record how time is spent across tasks, projects, clients, and departments. In simple terms, it answers: Where did the time go? It can support billing, payroll, cost control, utilization reporting, productivity analysis, and planning. A good time tracking tool reduces manual effort, improves accuracy, and provides reliable reports for managers and finance teams without turning tracking into a daily headache.

This category matters because time is one of the most important business inputs. Agencies must bill accurately. Services teams must understand utilization. Product teams need signals about effort vs outcomes. Operations teams need staffing insights. Without tracking, organizations either under-bill, overwork teams, or make planning decisions based on guesswork.

Real-world use cases:

• Billable hours for agencies, consultants, and freelancers
• Internal cost tracking for projects and departments
• Payroll support and attendance-style reporting (Varies / N/A)
• Utilization tracking for professional services and shared teams
• Timesheets for compliance, audits, and client reporting

What buyers should evaluate before choosing:

• Ease of capture (timers, manual entry, mobile support, reminders)
• Approval workflows (timesheet review, locking periods, audit history concepts)
• Reporting depth (project, client, team, role, utilization, trends)
• Billing support (billable vs non-billable, rates, invoicing connections)
• Integrations (project tools, calendars, accounting, HR, identity)
• Offline and mobile usability (Varies / N/A)
• Permissions (role-based access, manager visibility, client views)
• Automation (auto-tracking, suggested entries, policy rules)
• Scalability (many users, many clients, multi-entity support)
• Data export and governance (retention, audit readiness, controls)

Best for: organizations that need accurate effort and cost visibility for billing, payroll support, utilization, or planning across projects.
Not ideal for: teams that do not bill by time and do not need effort visibility, or teams that can rely on lightweight task completion signals instead of time-based metrics.

---

Key Trends in Time Tracking Software

• More automation: reminders, auto-tracking, and suggested entries (Varies / N/A)
• Higher focus on timesheet accuracy with approvals and audit visibility
• Better integrations with project tools to reduce manual tagging
• Stronger reporting for utilization and profitability insights
• More flexible rate rules by role, client, and project
• Increased use of mobile tracking for distributed and field teams
• Higher expectations for privacy controls and employee transparency
• More consolidation: time tracking connected to invoicing and expenses
• Better support for multi-team, multi-client operations with clean governance
• Increased demand for fast exports and finance-ready reporting

---

How We Selected These Tools

• Strong adoption in time tracking across freelancers, SMBs, and enterprises
• Reliable core features: timers, timesheets, approvals, reporting
• Practical billing and rate capabilities (where applicable)
• Integration readiness with project management and accounting ecosystems
• Balanced selection across simple and advanced tools
• Usability focus, because low adoption ruins data quality

---

Top 10 Time Tracking Software

1 — Toggl Track

Toggl Track is widely used for simple time tracking with a focus on usability and reporting. It fits individuals, agencies, and teams that want fast tracking and clean timesheet exports.

Key Features

• Timer-based tracking with manual edits and tagging
• Project and client tracking with billable and non-billable separation
• Reporting dashboards for time by project, team, and category (Varies / N/A)
• Reminders and tracking habits support (Varies / N/A)
• Team management for shared reporting and approvals concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Export options for finance and invoicing workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for teams that want high adoption with low friction

Pros

• Very easy to adopt and use daily
• Clear reporting for projects and clients

Cons

• Advanced enterprise governance features may be limited
• Deep payroll and HR features may require other systems

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often integrates with popular project and productivity tools.

• Project management tool integrations (Varies / N/A)
• Calendar and productivity workflow connections (Varies / N/A)
• APIs for custom reporting pipelines (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Strong documentation and onboarding resources. Support depends on plan.

---

2 — Harvest

Harvest combines time tracking with invoicing and reporting, making it popular for services teams and agencies. It fits teams that want time tracking connected to client billing.

Key Features

• Timesheets and timer-based tracking for projects and clients
• Billable rates and invoicing workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting for project budgets and tracked time (Varies / N/A)
• Team management and approvals concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Budget tracking and alerts patterns (Varies / N/A)
• Simple expense-style tracking options (Varies / N/A)
• Good fit for small-to-mid teams doing client work

Pros

• Strong for time tracking plus invoicing workflows
• Clean reporting for budget vs actual time

Cons

• Less focused on complex enterprise timesheet governance
• Some advanced workforce tracking needs may require other tools

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Commonly used alongside project tools and accounting workflows.

• Project tool integrations (Varies / N/A)
• Accounting-style export and connections (Varies / N/A)
• APIs and automation options vary by plan (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Good onboarding and documentation. Support tiers vary by plan.

---

3 — Clockify

Clockify is widely used for team time tracking and timesheets, often chosen for its broad feature coverage and scalability. It fits teams that need tracking across many users and projects.

Key Features

• Timer, manual time entry, and timesheet workflows
• Project, client, and task-level tracking with tags
• Team reporting and utilization-style visibility (Varies / N/A)
• Approval concepts and time locking patterns (Varies / N/A)
• Export options for finance and payroll workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Multi-team organization and permission controls (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for teams wanting a strong balance of features and cost

Pros

• Flexible tracking methods and scalable team support
• Good reporting and exports for many common needs

Cons

• Advanced invoicing workflows may be less central than specialist billing tools
• Reporting depth depends on plan and configuration

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often connects to project tools and productivity stacks for easier daily tracking.

• Integrations with task and project tools (Varies / N/A)
• Browser and desktop tracking extensions concepts (Varies / N/A)
• APIs for custom reporting and automation (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Good documentation footprint. Support depends on plan and organization size.

---

4 — Time Doctor

Time Doctor is often used by distributed teams that want time tracking with stronger activity and productivity signals. It fits organizations that require closer operational visibility for remote work.

Key Features

• Time tracking with desktop and web tracking options (Varies / N/A)
• Activity and productivity reporting concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Team-level dashboards for time and workload visibility (Varies / N/A)
• Timesheets and approval concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Reports for projects, tasks, and team performance signals (Varies / N/A)
• Integrations with project and payroll workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for remote-first operations and managed teams

Pros

• Strong operational visibility for distributed teams
• Useful reports for time and activity-style signals

Cons

• Teams may need clear privacy policies and transparency to ensure trust
• Some organizations may not want productivity monitoring-style features

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, Windows, macOS (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often used with project tools to connect tracked time with work items.

• Project tool integrations (Varies / N/A)
• Payroll workflow connections (Varies / N/A)
• APIs and automation options depend on setup (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Support tiers vary. Adoption works best with clear policies and good onboarding.

---

5 — Hubstaff

Hubstaff is used for time tracking in teams that want scheduling, timesheets, and operational visibility for distributed work. It fits field teams and remote teams that need structured tracking routines.

Key Features

• Time tracking with timers and timesheets
• Scheduling and shift planning concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Team activity reporting patterns (Varies / N/A)
• Project and client tracking for billing workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Approvals and time locking concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting for productivity and utilization signals (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for remote and field workforce tracking needs

Pros

• Helpful for teams that want time tracking plus scheduling routines
• Good operational reporting for distributed teams

Cons

• Monitoring-style features may require careful policy and transparency
• Some advanced finance workflows may require other systems

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often integrated with project tools and payroll workflows.

• Project and task tool integrations (Varies / N/A)
• Payroll and export workflows (Varies / N/A)
• APIs for custom reporting and automation (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Support depends on plan. Best results come from clear tracking rules and team training.

---

6 — QuickBooks Time

QuickBooks Time is often used by teams that need time tracking connected to payroll and accounting-style workflows. It fits organizations already working in QuickBooks-centered environments.

Key Features

• Timesheets for teams and individuals
• Mobile-friendly tracking for field teams (Varies / N/A)
• Approvals and manager oversight concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting for jobs, projects, and labor costs (Varies / N/A)
• Payroll and invoicing workflow alignment concepts (Varies / N/A)
• GPS or location concepts for field work (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for organizations needing payroll-friendly time tracking

Pros

• Strong fit when payroll and accounting workflows are central
• Helpful for field teams needing mobile tracking

Cons

• Best value depends on your accounting environment
• Some advanced project planning needs may require separate tools

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often used when time tracking must connect closely to accounting operations.

• Integrations with accounting workflows (Varies / N/A)
• Export and reporting pipelines depend on setup (Varies / N/A)
• APIs and connectors vary by plan (Varies / N/A)

Support and Community
Support depends on plan. Adoption improves when payroll rules and approvals are clearly defined.

---

7 — Zoho Projects

Zoho Projects includes time tracking inside a broader project management environment. It fits teams that want tracked time tied directly to tasks and project execution.

Key Features

• Time tracking within project tasks and milestones (Varies / N/A)
• Timesheets and approvals concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting for project time and utilization signals (Varies / N/A)
• Project planning views with tasks and dependencies (Varies / N/A)
• Client and project billing patterns (Varies / N/A)
• Integration fit within broader Zoho business tools (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for teams wanting one tool for projects and time tracking

Pros

• Good when time tracking must stay connected to project tasks
• Useful for teams already using Zoho tools

Cons

• Deep standalone time tracking analytics may be limited
• Some advanced workforce tracking needs may require other tools

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often selected when organizations want project tracking and time tracking together.

• Integrations depend on the broader business stack (Varies / N/A)
• APIs and connectors vary by setup (Varies / N/A)
• Best results come from consistent project templates and roles

Support and Community
Support varies. Documentation and onboarding are typically stronger when the tool is used consistently across teams.

---

8 — Wrike

Wrike supports time tracking inside a structured work management platform. It fits teams that need approvals, reporting, and multi-project visibility with tracked time tied to work items.

Key Features

• Time tracking connected to tasks and projects (Varies / N/A)
• Timesheets and approvals concepts (Varies / N/A)
• Dashboards and reporting for project time and workload signals (Varies / N/A)
• Workflow control and templates for governed execution
• Role-based permissions and visibility (Varies / N/A)
• Multi-project reporting and portfolio views (Varies / N/A)
• Useful for operational teams tracking time across many projects

Pros

• Strong when time tracking must be tied to governed workflows
• Good dashboards for managers and stakeholders

Cons

• Might be heavier than needed for simple time tracking only
• Reporting quality depends on standardized templates

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Often integrates with storage and collaboration tools to keep delivery work centralized.

• Integrations with file and collaboration tools (Varies / N/A)
• APIs for automation and reporting pipelines (Varies / N/A)
• Works best when time tracking rules and approvals are consistent

Support and Community
Support tiers vary. Best results come from standardized workflows and training.

---

9 — Asana

Asana supports time tracking concepts through integrations and tracking routines within work management. It fits teams that want time-related visibility connected to tasks and collaboration workflows, depending on how they configure their stack.

Key Features

• Task-based work management that can support time tracking routines (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting dashboards for workload and progress signals (Varies / N/A)
• Templates for standardized project execution and tracking patterns
• Automation rules for reminders and updates
• Collaboration through comments and activity history
• Multi-team visibility for cross-functional execution
• Useful when time insights are part of a broader work visibility approach

Pros

• Strong adoption and usability for cross-functional teams
• Works well when time insights must stay close to project execution

Cons

• Dedicated time tracking depth may depend on integrations and setup
• Some timesheet governance features may be limited without additional tooling

Platforms / Deployment

• Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)
• Cloud

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Commonly used with supporting tools to add time tracking depth.

• Integrations vary depending on your time tracking approach (Varies / N/A)
• APIs support automation and custom reporting (Varies / N/A)
• Best results come from standard task structures and tagging

Support and Community
Strong onboarding and community content. Support varies by plan.

---

10 — Jira Software

Jira Software supports time tracking through worklog-style time entry connected to issues. It fits engineering teams that want tracked time directly tied to tickets, sprints, and delivery work.

Key Features

• Worklog time tracking connected to issues (Varies / N/A)
• Reporting concepts for time and effort visibility (Varies / N/A)
• Permission models for teams and projects (Varies / N/A)
• Workflow customization for governed delivery processes
• Dashboards for project tracking and reporting (Varies / N/A)
• Strong ecosystem for extensions and reporting add-ons (Varies / N/A)
• Useful when tracked time must align with engineering delivery processes

Pros

• Strong fit for engineering teams tracking time on issues
• Useful ecosystem for reporting and workflow extensions

Cons

• Timesheet-style experiences may require extra configuration
• Not designed primarily as a standalone time tracking product

Platforms / Deployment

• Web
• Cloud, Self-hosted (Varies / N/A)

Security and Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations and Ecosystem
Commonly integrated with engineering delivery pipelines and reporting stacks.

• Marketplace extensions and integrations (Varies / N/A)
• APIs for reporting and automation (Varies / N/A)
• Best results come from consistent issue tagging and time entry rules

Support and Community
Large community and documentation footprint. Support depends on plan and deployment.

---

Comparison Table

Tool Name	Best For	Platform(s) Supported	Deployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)	Standout Feature	Public Rating
Toggl Track	Simple tracking with strong usability	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Fast tracking and clean reporting	N/A
Harvest	Time tracking linked to invoicing	Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Billing-friendly workflows	N/A
Clockify	Scalable team time tracking and timesheets	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Flexible timesheets and team reporting	N/A
Time Doctor	Remote operations visibility with time tracking	Web, Windows, macOS (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Activity-style reporting signals	N/A
Hubstaff	Time tracking plus scheduling for distributed teams	Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Scheduling and operational reporting	N/A
QuickBooks Time	Time tracking connected to payroll workflows	Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Payroll-friendly timesheets	N/A
Zoho Projects	Time tracking inside project execution	Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Time tied to tasks and milestones	N/A
Wrike	Time tracking inside governed workflows	Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Dashboards and approvals patterns	N/A
Asana	Time insights within broader work management	Web, iOS, Android (Varies / N/A)	Cloud	Usable execution visibility	N/A
Jira Software	Engineering worklogs tied to issues	Web	Cloud/Self-hosted (Varies / N/A)	Time tracked directly on tickets	N/A

---

Evaluation and Scoring of Time Tracking Software

Scoring model:

• Each criterion uses a 1–10 score for comparative shortlisting.
• Weighted Total is a directional estimate across this list, not a verified public rating.
• Use scoring to shortlist, then validate with a pilot using real workflows and approval rules.
• Treat must-haves like payroll alignment, invoicing, or strict timesheet approvals as filters before scores.

Weights:

• Core features – 25%
• Ease of use – 15%
• Integrations and ecosystem – 15%
• Security and compliance – 10%
• Performance and reliability – 10%
• Support and community – 10%
• Price / value – 15%

Tool Name	Core (25%)	Ease (15%)	Integrations (15%)	Security (10%)	Performance (10%)	Support (10%)	Value (15%)	Weighted Total (0–10)
Toggl Track	8	9	7	6	7	7	8	7.75
Harvest	8	8	7	6	7	7	7	7.35
Clockify	8	8	7	6	7	7	9	7.80
Time Doctor	8	7	6	6	7	7	6	6.90
Hubstaff	8	7	6	6	7	7	6	6.90
QuickBooks Time	7	7	7	6	7	7	6	6.85
Zoho Projects	7	7	7	6	7	6	7	6.85
Wrike	7	7	7	7	7	7	6	6.85
Asana	6	9	8	7	7	8	7	7.25
Jira Software	7	6	8	7	7	8	6	6.95

How to interpret these scores:

• Core rewards tracking methods, approvals, reporting, and billing readiness.
• Ease matters because tracking only works when people actually use it daily.
• Integrations matter when time must be tied to projects, tickets, payroll, or invoicing.
• Value depends on team size, reporting needs, and how much governance you need.

---

Which Time Tracking Software Is Right for You?

Solo / Freelancer

Freelancers should prioritize speed and low friction, plus clean reporting for clients. Toggl Track and Harvest are strong options when you need client-friendly reporting. Clockify can work if you want flexible timesheets and scalable reporting as you grow. Keep your structure simple: a few clients, clear project naming, and a weekly review.

SMB

SMBs often need team timesheets, manager approvals, and billing visibility. Clockify and Harvest are strong for many SMB service teams. Toggl Track works well when you want adoption and quick tracking. If payroll alignment is central, QuickBooks Time can be valuable depending on your accounting environment. The key is to define a simple policy: what is billable, how to tag time, and how approvals work.

Mid-Market

Mid-market organizations often need more consistent governance and reporting across departments. Wrike and Zoho Projects can work when time tracking should stay connected to project execution. Hubstaff and Time Doctor can fit when operational visibility is needed for distributed work, but the organization must define clear privacy and transparency policies. Clockify is often a flexible choice as teams scale due to timesheets and reporting breadth.

Enterprise

Enterprises typically need strong permission control, audit-friendly timesheet processes, and integration with delivery systems. Jira Software fits engineering teams where time must be logged against issues and tracked through governance workflows. Wrike can fit when time tracking must be tied to governed workflows across many projects. Enterprises should focus on standard tagging, consistent timesheet approval cycles, and high-quality reporting exports aligned to finance needs.

Budget vs Premium

• Budget-first teams should choose tools that maximize adoption and keep workflows simple.
• Premium value is justified when approvals, billing accuracy, and reporting reduce real cost leakage.
• A low-cost tool with high usage often beats a premium tool no one updates.

Feature Depth vs Ease of Use

• If adoption is your risk, pick the simplest tool and keep categories limited.
• If billing and compliance are your risk, prioritize approvals, audit history concepts, and export reliability.
• If time tracking becomes too detailed, people stop using it; balance accuracy with simplicity.

Integrations and Scalability

Time tracking becomes far easier when it connects to the tools people already use. Validate integration with project management, ticketing, calendars, and accounting workflows so entries are not duplicated. For scalability, test multi-client reporting, permission boundaries, performance with many projects, and export speed for finance teams.

Security and Compliance Needs

Security features vary by plan and platform. Focus on role-based access, timesheet locking, audit history, and reporting controls. If using monitoring-oriented tools, ensure you have a clear policy, employee transparency, and defined boundaries to protect trust.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

1.Do time tracking tools improve productivity?
They can, when used for visibility and planning. If used as surveillance, they can reduce trust and adoption, which harms data quality.

2.Should we track time by task or by project?
Start by tracking by project and category. Move to task-level only if you truly need that detail for billing or reporting.

3.What is the biggest mistake with time tracking?
Making the process too complex. Too many categories or strict rules cause people to avoid tracking or enter inaccurate data.

4.How often should timesheets be submitted?
Weekly is common because it balances accuracy and effort. Some teams prefer daily reminders to reduce end-of-week memory gaps.

5.Do we need approvals for timesheets?
Approvals help with billing, payroll, and compliance. For small teams, approvals may be optional if trust and accuracy are already strong.

6.What is the best approach for billable vs non-billable time?
Define clear categories and train teams on consistent tagging. Review regularly so billing rules stay aligned with client agreements.

7.Can time tracking support utilization reporting?
Yes, many tools report time by person, role, and project. Utilization becomes meaningful only when categories are consistent.

8.What should we do if people forget to track time?
Use reminders, keep categories simple, and create a habit. Some tools support auto-tracking concepts, but policies should remain clear.

9.How do we switch time tracking tools safely?
Export your historical data, map categories, run both tools in parallel for a short period, and confirm reports match before fully switching.

10.Are there alternatives to time tracking?
Yes. Some teams use outcome-based delivery metrics, ticket counts, or milestone completion. However, billing and cost control often still require tracked time.

---

Conclusion

Time tracking software is most valuable when it delivers clarity without creating friction. The best tool depends on whether you track time for billing, payroll support, utilization, planning, or operational visibility. Some teams succeed with simple tools that people actually use every day. Others need stronger approvals, reporting exports, and workflow governance to support finance and compliance requirements. A practical next step is to shortlist two or three tools, run a pilot with real projects and real reporting needs, and test daily usability, manager approvals, and export accuracy. Validate that reports match what finance and leaders need, and make sure the tracking policy is simple and transparent so adoption stays high. Once tracking becomes a habit, time data becomes a reliable input for better planning and better decisions.