Top 10 Audit Management Software: Features, Pros, Cons and Comparison

Posted on February 23, 2026February 23, 2026 | by khushboo

Introduction

Audit management software helps internal audit, compliance, and risk teams plan audits, run fieldwork, collect and review evidence, document workpapers, track findings, and report results in a repeatable way. In simple terms, it replaces scattered spreadsheets, email threads, shared drives, and manual status updates with one system where you can define the audit scope, assign tasks, store evidence, record testing results, and track remediation until closure. Good audit tools also help maintain consistency across audits by using templates, standardized workflows, and structured reporting.

Audit management matters because audits are no longer occasional exercises. Organizations run audits for financial controls, operational processes, cybersecurity controls, vendor oversight, privacy requirements, and regulatory expectations. Auditors also need better visibility into what is happening in real time, especially when audit owners are distributed across departments. Audit software reduces delays by automating task routing, reminders, and evidence requests. It improves defensibility by keeping an audit trail of who did what and when. It also helps leadership see risk trends across audits and prioritize remediation.

Common use cases include:

Annual audit planning and audit universe management
Audit execution with workpapers, testing, and evidence tracking
Findings management with remediation owners and due dates
Management reporting, dashboards, and board-ready summaries
Coordination with compliance, risk, and control owner teams

What buyers should evaluate:

Audit planning features: audit universe, risk assessment, scheduling
Workpaper and evidence management: structure, versioning, traceability
Testing workflows: sampling, control testing, sign-offs, approvals
Findings lifecycle: ownership, due dates, escalation, verification
Reporting: dashboards, executive summaries, issue trends
Workflow automation: reminders, approvals, task routing
Collaboration: comments, assignments, stakeholder visibility
Integration: ticketing, identity, document storage, GRC systems
Access controls: role-based access and audit trails
Pricing and usability: time-to-value, learning curve, admin effort

Best for: Internal audit teams, compliance teams, and risk teams that run recurring audits and need structured evidence handling, standardized workpapers, and strong remediation tracking.

Not ideal for: Very small teams doing rare audits with low complexity, where basic checklists may work, though the lack of audit trail and reporting can become a risk.

Key Trends in Audit Management Software

More workflow automation for evidence requests and follow-ups
Better collaboration features for distributed audit and control owner teams
Deeper reporting for audit trend analysis and board-level summaries
More integration with ticketing tools for remediation tracking
Increased support for continuous auditing and ongoing monitoring
Greater alignment between audit, risk, and compliance workflows
More templating and standardization to improve audit consistency
Stronger access controls and audit trails for defensibility
Better support for multi-entity and multi-program audit operations
Improved usability to reduce training burden for non-audit stakeholders

How We Selected These Tools

Strong recognition and adoption in internal audit and compliance environments
Solid coverage across planning, fieldwork, workpapers, findings, and reporting
Practical usability for audit teams and process owners
Workflow flexibility and templating for different audit types
Reporting strength for management and board-level views
Integration readiness with ticketing and document storage systems
Scalability for multiple audits, teams, and business units
Evidence handling quality and traceability for defensible audits
Support maturity and documentation quality for onboarding
Balanced mix across audit-first and broader governance platforms

Top 10 Audit Management Software

1 — AuditBoard

AuditBoard is commonly used for internal audit execution, evidence workflows, and findings remediation tracking. It fits teams that want strong collaboration and clear audit lifecycle visibility.

Key Features

Audit planning and scheduling workflows
Workpaper management and structured evidence collection
Testing workflows with sign-offs and approvals
Findings management with remediation ownership and tracking
Dashboards for audit progress and issue trends
Collaboration tools for audit teams and control owners

Pros

Strong usability and collaboration for audit teams
Clear dashboards for progress and remediation tracking

Cons

Advanced customization may require careful setup
Integration depth depends on configuration and plan scope

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to fit audit workflows and connect with operational tools.

Integration patterns with ticketing tools for remediation
Export options for reports and evidence packages
APIs depending on plan and environment
Supports multi-audit operations with standardized templates

Support & Community
Support is generally strong; documentation is clear; community footprint is growing.

2 — Diligent HighBond

Diligent HighBond supports audit workflows with strong reporting and accountability features. It fits teams that want practical audit execution tooling tied to risk visibility.

Key Features

Audit planning and execution workflows
Workpaper and evidence tracking support
Findings and remediation tracking workflows
Dashboards for audit status and issue reporting
Collaboration workflows across stakeholders
Program reporting for leadership visibility

Pros

Strong reporting and audit program visibility
Practical workflows for audit execution

Cons

Feature scope varies by modules used
Deep customization may require additional configuration work

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed for governance workflows and operational reporting.

Integrations with task and ticket workflows depending on setup
APIs depending on plan and environment
Export workflows for reports and audit evidence
Works well in structured internal audit programs

Support & Community
Support is generally strong; documentation is established; community footprint is moderate.

3 — TeamMate+

TeamMate+ is widely used for internal audit management and structured audit execution. It fits teams that want mature workpaper management and standardized audit methodology support.

Key Features

Audit planning and audit universe management
Workpaper management with structured methodology support
Evidence management and audit trail tracking
Findings and action plan tracking
Reporting for audit program status and trends
Collaboration workflows for audit teams

Pros

Mature internal audit workflow design and structure
Strong fit for standardized audit methodology

Cons

User experience can feel complex for non-auditors
Setup and administration may require specialist effort

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to support established audit methodologies and reporting.

Integrations depend on environment and deployment
Export options for audit reports and evidence
APIs may be available depending on configuration
Fits mature audit programs with standardized workflows

Support & Community
Strong professional ecosystem; documentation is established; community footprint is large in audit circles.

4 — Workiva

Workiva is often used for connected reporting, evidence workflows, and assurance processes across finance, audit, and compliance. It fits teams that want strong reporting workflows and collaboration.

Key Features

Audit and assurance workflow support depending on setup
Evidence and document collaboration workflows
Reporting workflows for management and board outputs
Task management and approvals for audit activities
Traceability features for supporting documentation
Cross-team collaboration with structured reporting

Pros

Strong reporting and collaboration capabilities
Useful for teams connecting audit work to reporting workflows

Cons

Audit-specific workflow depth depends on configuration
Implementation may require planning to match audit methodology

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed for connecting work and reporting across teams.

Integration patterns with document storage and reporting workflows
APIs depending on plan and environment
Export options for board-ready reporting packs
Fits organizations with connected assurance reporting needs

Support & Community
Support is generally strong; documentation is good; community footprint is large in reporting environments.

5 — SAP Audit Management

SAP Audit Management is commonly used in organizations with strong SAP footprints. It fits teams that want audit workflows aligned with enterprise process and governance operations.

Key Features

Audit planning and scheduling workflows
Workpaper management aligned to enterprise processes
Evidence collection and documentation support
Findings tracking and remediation workflows
Reporting workflows for audit visibility
Alignment with SAP governance and enterprise operations

Pros

Strong fit for SAP-centric environments
Useful alignment with enterprise process governance

Cons

Best value depends heavily on SAP ecosystem usage
Setup and administration can be complex

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud, Self-hosted

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Most effective when integrated with SAP operations and governance.

Strong SAP ecosystem alignment
Integration patterns with access and process controls
Reporting exports for audit and governance workflows
Fits structured SAP governance environments

Support & Community
Strong enterprise support; SAP community footprint is large; documentation is extensive.

6 — ServiceNow Audit Management

ServiceNow Audit Management fits organizations that want audit workflows integrated into IT operations and service management. It works well when audit issues need strong remediation workflow ties.

Key Features

Audit planning and execution workflows
Evidence collection and task routing automation
Findings tracking connected to operational remediation workflows
Dashboards for audit progress and issue status
Workflow automation for approvals and assignments
Integration patterns with IT service operations

Pros

Strong workflow automation and remediation routing
Good for organizations already standardized on ServiceNow

Cons

Setup can be complex if workflows are not well defined
Licensing and admin overhead may be high for smaller teams

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud, Self-hosted

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed for workflow-driven remediation and operational integration.

Integrations with IT service processes and ticketing
APIs for automation and reporting
Connectors for operational evidence signals depending on setup
Fits large organizations with structured workflows

Support & Community
Strong enterprise ecosystem; large community; documentation is extensive.

7 — MetricStream Audit Management

MetricStream Audit Management supports audit execution as part of broader governance workflows. It fits organizations that want audit operations connected to risk, compliance, and control programs.

Key Features

Audit planning and audit program management
Workpaper support and evidence management
Findings tracking and remediation workflows
Reporting dashboards for audit trends and status
Workflow automation for tasks and approvals
Integration patterns with governance workflows

Pros

Good fit when audit must connect to broader GRC programs
Strong program reporting across audits and issues

Cons

Implementation and configuration can be complex
Best outcomes require process standardization

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud, Self-hosted

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to connect audit workflows to governance operations.

APIs for workflow automation and reporting
Integrations with ticketing and compliance workflows
Import and export workflows for evidence and reports
Supports multi-program governance alignment

Support & Community
Enterprise support is common; documentation is established; community footprint is moderate.

8 — RSA Archer Audit Management

RSA Archer Audit Management fits teams that want configurable audit workflows inside a broader risk and compliance platform. It works well for structured organizations needing flexible configuration.

Key Features

Configurable audit planning and scheduling workflows
Workpaper management and evidence tracking support
Findings management with remediation workflows
Risk-linked audit program reporting
Workflow customization for different audit types
Dashboards for audit and issue visibility

Pros

Strong configurability for diverse audit programs
Useful when audits must link to enterprise risk workflows

Cons

Administration effort can be significant
User experience depends heavily on configuration quality

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Self-hosted, Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed for enterprise program integration.

APIs and import workflows for audit and risk data
Integrations with ticketing and governance workflows
Reporting exports for management visibility
Supports multi-framework governance alignment

Support & Community
Strong enterprise ecosystem; training availability is common; community footprint is large.

9 — Wolters Kluwer TeamMate AM

Wolters Kluwer TeamMate AM focuses on internal audit management and structured methodology support. It fits teams that want mature audit lifecycle control and standardized workpapers.

Key Features

Audit planning and audit universe management
Workpaper templates and methodology support
Evidence handling and audit trail tracking
Findings and action plan management workflows
Reporting for audit progress and trends
Collaboration workflows for audit teams

Pros

Mature internal audit workflow structure
Strong fit for audit methodology standardization

Cons

Interface may feel complex for occasional stakeholders
Setup and administration may require experienced owners

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to support internal audit program operations.

Integrations vary by deployment and environment
Export options for reports and evidence packs
APIs may be available depending on configuration
Fits mature internal audit programs

Support & Community
Support is professional and established; documentation is strong; community footprint is large in audit circles.

10 — Onspring Audit Management

Onspring Audit Management focuses on configurable workflows for audit and governance use cases. It fits teams that want flexibility and easier adaptation to internal processes.

Key Features

Configurable audit planning and workflow templates
Workpaper and evidence tracking support
Findings management with ownership and due dates
Dashboards for audit status and issue trends
Workflow automation for approvals and task routing
Reporting tools for leadership visibility

Pros

Flexible configuration for different audit programs
Useful dashboards for tracking progress and remediation

Cons

Teams must design workflows carefully for consistency
Integration depth depends on environment and plan

Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud

Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated

Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed for configurable governance workflows.

APIs for workflow automation and integrations
Integration patterns with ticketing and task tools
Export options for reporting and audit evidence
Supports multi-program governance setups

Support & Community
Support is generally strong; documentation is practical; community footprint is growing.

Comparison Table

Tool Name	Best For	Platform(s) Supported	Deployment	Standout Feature	Public Rating
AuditBoard	Collaborative internal audit execution and tracking	Web	Cloud	Strong usability and dashboards	N/A
Diligent HighBond	Audit program reporting and accountability	Web	Cloud	Reporting and visibility	N/A
TeamMate+	Standardized internal audit methodology workflows	Web	Cloud	Mature workpaper structure	N/A
Workiva	Connected assurance reporting and collaboration	Web	Cloud	Reporting collaboration and traceability	N/A
SAP Audit Management	SAP-aligned audit workflows in enterprise environments	Web	Cloud, Self-hosted	SAP ecosystem alignment	N/A
ServiceNow Audit Management	Audit workflows tied to IT remediation operations	Web	Cloud, Self-hosted	Workflow automation for remediation	N/A
MetricStream Audit Management	Audit operations connected to broader governance programs	Web	Cloud, Self-hosted	Integrated GRC alignment	N/A
RSA Archer Audit Management	Configurable audit workflows tied to risk programs	Web	Self-hosted, Cloud	Highly configurable workflows	N/A
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate AM	Mature internal audit lifecycle control	Web	Cloud	Methodology-driven audit workpapers	N/A
Onspring Audit Management	Flexible workflow configuration for audit programs	Web	Cloud	Configurable workflows and dashboards	N/A

Evaluation and Scoring of Audit Management Software

Weights used: Core features (25%), Ease of use (15%), Integrations and ecosystem (15%), Security and compliance (10%), Performance and reliability (10%), Support and community (10%), Price and value (15%).

Tool Name	Core (25%)	Ease (15%)	Integrations (15%)	Security (10%)	Performance (10%)	Support (10%)	Value (15%)	Weighted Total
AuditBoard	8	8	7	6	7	7	6	7.20
Diligent HighBond	8	7	6	6	7	7	6	6.95
TeamMate+	9	6	6	6	7	7	5	6.85
Workiva	7	7	7	6	7	7	6	6.80
SAP Audit Management	7	5	7	6	7	7	5	6.35
ServiceNow Audit Management	8	6	8	6	7	8	5	6.95
MetricStream Audit Management	8	6	7	6	7	7	5	6.70
RSA Archer Audit Management	8	5	6	6	7	7	5	6.45
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate AM	9	6	6	6	7	7	5	6.85
Onspring Audit Management	7	8	6	6	7	7	7	6.95

How to interpret the scores:

Scores are comparative within this list and help shortlist tools for your audit operating model.
Core reflects planning, workpapers, evidence handling, testing, findings, and reporting coverage.
Ease reflects onboarding, daily workflow effort, and usability for audit teams and stakeholders.
A pilot audit is the best way to validate evidence workflows, reporting needs, and remediation routing.

Which Audit Management Software Is Right for You?

Solo / Freelancer
Most solo teams do not need full audit software unless they run audits for multiple clients. If you do, prioritize ease of setup, templates, and clean reporting.

SMB
SMBs should prioritize fast rollout, simple evidence requests, and easy findings tracking. Tools with clear dashboards and strong reminders reduce the biggest operational pain.

Mid-Market
Mid-market teams often need stronger standardization, multi-audit coordination, and integration with ticketing for remediation. Choose a platform that scales without increasing admin burden.

Enterprise
Enterprises should prioritize deep workflows, role-based access, audit trails, multi-entity management, and integrated remediation routing. Validate reporting depth for leadership and board-level needs.

Budget vs Premium
Budget tools can work for smaller audit programs and simpler workflows. Premium tools deliver stronger standardization, governance, integrations, and reporting that reduce long-term audit effort.

Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
If adoption is a challenge, prioritize usability and templates. If you have mature audit methodology and high audit volume, deeper tools support stronger controls and standardized workpapers.

Integrations and Scalability
Confirm integrations with ticketing tools, identity providers, and document storage. Scalability means handling many audits, many owners, and large evidence volumes without slowing down.

Security and Compliance Needs
Prioritize role-based access, audit logs, and evidence traceability. If you have strict requirements, validate vendor documentation for security claims during procurement.

Frequently Asked Questions

1) What is audit management software used for?
It helps plan audits, manage workpapers, collect evidence, document testing, track findings, and report results in a structured workflow.

2) How does it reduce audit cycle time?
It automates assignments, reminders, evidence collection, and status reporting so audits move faster and fewer items get stuck.

3) What is the most common first step in implementation?
Start with one audit template and one pilot audit, then standardize workpapers and evidence requests before scaling to the full audit plan.

4) Can these tools track remediation and follow-ups?
Yes. Most support findings ownership, due dates, escalation, and verification, though depth varies by tool.

5) Do we still need a GRC platform if we have audit software?
It depends. If you also manage enterprise risk, compliance frameworks, and vendor risk, a broader platform may provide more value.

6) What is the biggest mistake teams make when buying audit tools?
Buying for features without validating usability for control owners. If stakeholders do not respond well, evidence collection still becomes slow.

7) How do we measure success after rollout?
Shorter audit cycles, fewer overdue findings, better evidence quality, fewer repeated issues, and clearer management reporting.

8) Can audit tools support IT and cybersecurity audits?
Yes. Many teams use them for IT controls, security controls, operational audits, and vendor reviews, not only financial audits.

9) How do we choose between similar tools?
Run a pilot audit with real workpapers and evidence needs, test reporting and remediation workflows, and measure admin effort.

10) What should we validate in a pilot?
Evidence upload and traceability, testing workflows, reporting clarity, stakeholder collaboration, and how findings move to remediation.

Conclusion

Audit management software helps internal audit and compliance teams standardize audits, improve evidence handling, and track findings to closure without relying on manual spreadsheets. The best tool depends on your audit volume, methodology maturity, stakeholder collaboration needs, and whether remediation must integrate tightly with ticketing or IT operations. Start by shortlisting two or three tools that match your environment, then run a pilot audit using a real template, real evidence requests, and realistic timelines. Measure how quickly control owners respond, how clean the evidence trail is, and how easy it is to produce a final report and track remediation. Once you choose a platform, standardize templates, train stakeholders with simple steps, and expand gradually to cover the full annual audit plan.