Top 10 Heatmap Tools: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

---

Introduction

Heatmap tools visualize aggregated user behavior on your website or product by turning interactions into color-coded patterns. They help teams quickly see what people click, how far they scroll, and which areas get attention so you can improve clarity, reduce friction, and prioritize UX changes based on evidence.

Heatmaps matter because modern experiences are fast-changing and multi-device. A small design issue—like a CTA that blends into the background, a “fake button” users keep clicking, or key content placed too low—can quietly reduce conversion and retention. Heatmaps provide a fast feedback loop that complements analytics, session replay, and experimentation.

Practical use cases:

• Improving landing pages by identifying which sections attract attention and which get ignored.
• Fixing navigation confusion by spotting repeated clicks on non-clickable elements.
• Optimizing forms by seeing where users hesitate, abandon, or mis-click.
• Validating new layouts by comparing interaction patterns before and after changes.
• Prioritizing UX backlog by tying visible friction patterns to high-impact pages.

What buyers should evaluate:

• Heatmap types supported (click/tap, scroll depth, attention/movement patterns, and others).
• Accuracy on dynamic pages (single-page apps, personalization, responsive layouts).
• Filters and segmentation (device type, traffic source, new vs returning, converting vs non-converting).
• Privacy and governance (masking/redaction, exclusion rules, access permissions, retention).
• Workflow speed (setup effort, time to meaningful signal, clarity of dashboards).
• Collaboration (annotations, sharing internally, exporting insights into work items).
• Integration fit (analytics, A/B testing, tag managers, support, bug tracking, data pipelines).
• Pricing model and cost drivers (sessions/pageviews, seats, features, add-ons).

Mandatory paragraph

Best for: Marketing, CRO, UX, and product teams that ship frequent changes and need quick, visual insight into whether users notice and use key elements.

Not ideal for: Teams that cannot implement privacy governance for behavior data, or teams expecting heatmaps to prove causality without follow-up validation.

---

Key trends in heatmap tools

• More resilient heatmaps for dynamic content, personalization, and responsive layouts.
• Stronger segmentation so teams can compare behavior by device, channel, and campaign.
• Closer pairing of heatmaps with session replay so you can move from a hotspot to real sessions.
• More friction signals (dead clicks, rage clicks, quick backs) surfacing alongside classic click/scroll maps.
• Increased focus on privacy controls, with safer defaults and more granular masking.
• Better collaboration workflows so insights become tickets, experiments, and shipped changes.
• Expansion beyond marketing pages into product UX and in-app journeys for some vendors.

---

How we selected these tools (methodology)

• Included widely used tools that offer heatmaps as a core capability or a major module.
• Balanced buyer profiles: SMB-friendly tools, CRO-first tools, product/engineering-oriented tools, and enterprise digital experience platforms.
• Prioritized practical workflows: fast setup, useful filtering, reliable page capture, and stakeholder-friendly visuals.
• Considered how well each tool supports modern sites (dynamic UI, multiple devices, frequent releases).
• Treated security/compliance claims conservatively; if unclear, marked as “Not publicly stated.”
• Kept the list at exactly 10 tools and used the same 10 tools in every section and table.

---

Top 10 Heatmap Tools

Tool 1 — Hotjar

Hotjar is a behavior analytics tool commonly used for website heatmaps and qualitative UX insights. It’s typically adopted by teams that want quick visual evidence to guide conversion and usability improvements.

Key Features

• Click/tap heatmaps to show interaction density.
• Scroll heatmaps to show how far users reach on a page.
• Attention-style patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Filters to compare behavior by device and other segments (Varies / N/A).
• Snapshot-style analysis to focus on specific pages and time windows (Varies / N/A).
• Sharing and collaboration workflows for internal teams (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Strong time-to-value for UX and conversion work.
• Visual outputs are easy to communicate to stakeholders.

Cons

• Advanced governance features vary by plan.
• Highly dynamic pages can require careful configuration.

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Hotjar commonly sits alongside analytics and experimentation so heatmap patterns become validated changes.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Experimentation and rollout workflow pairing (Varies / N/A).
• Exports and APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Integration depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 2 — Microsoft Clarity

Microsoft Clarity provides heatmaps and behavior analytics aimed at making UX friction easier to see and diagnose for websites.

Key Features

• Click maps, scroll maps, and additional heatmap views depending on configuration.
• Heatmaps designed to generate quickly after sufficient data is collected (Varies / N/A).
• Page grouping and organizational workflows (Varies / N/A).
• Segmentation and filtering workflows (Varies / N/A).
• Pairing with session recordings (Varies / N/A).
• Simple workflows to identify common friction patterns (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Easy entry point for teams starting with heatmap-driven optimization.
• Useful for quick diagnostics and prioritization.

Cons

• Enterprise governance and compliance details require verification.
• Integration depth may be limited for advanced stacks (Varies / N/A).

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Clarity is often used alongside analytics to connect “what happened” with “where users struggled.”

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Export/sharing workflows (Varies / N/A).
• APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Ecosystem depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 3 — Crazy Egg

Crazy Egg is a heatmap-focused tool often used by CRO teams working on landing pages, pricing pages, and checkout journeys.

Key Features

• Click heatmaps for interaction visibility.
• Scroll heatmaps for content placement decisions.
• Segmenting or comparing heatmaps by device and sources (Varies / N/A).
• Page snapshots to analyze specific versions of pages (Varies / N/A).
• Reporting views for stakeholder sharing (Varies / N/A).
• Optimization workflows that support iteration (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Strong fit for conversion-focused website optimization.
• Easy-to-understand visuals help drive alignment.

Cons

• Deeper product analytics use cases may need additional tools.
• Governance and compliance details vary (Not publicly stated).

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Crazy Egg typically fits into a CRO stack that includes analytics and experimentation.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Experimentation pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Integration depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 4 — Lucky Orange

Lucky Orange combines heatmaps with broader UX and site behavior workflows, commonly used by ecommerce and marketing teams.

Key Features

• Dynamic heatmaps (Varies / N/A).
• Click and scroll visibility for key pages (Varies / N/A).
• Session recordings to validate heatmap patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Form-focused signals (Varies / N/A).
• Funnel-style views (Varies / N/A).
• Real-time or near real-time visitor observation patterns (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Helpful “bundle” approach for smaller teams.
• Practical for sites that change frequently.

Cons

• Can include more features than needed if you only want heatmaps.
• Advanced governance details require verification.

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Lucky Orange often acts as an optimization layer alongside analytics and commerce tooling.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Ecommerce tooling fit (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Integration depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 5 — Mouseflow

Mouseflow is used for heatmaps and behavior analytics, often chosen by teams that want multiple heatmap types and replay in one tool.

Key Features

• Multiple heatmap types (click, scroll, and others depending on plan) (Varies / N/A).
• Heatmap generation workflows for specific pages and time windows (Varies / N/A).
• Session recording support to connect patterns to real sessions (Varies / N/A).
• Filters and segmentation to compare audience groups (Varies / N/A).
• Funnel and form-style analysis patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Sharing and export workflows (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Broad heatmap coverage supports deeper UX investigations.
• Works well when you want heatmaps plus replay together.

Cons

• Setup options can feel complex for new teams.
• Governance/compliance details vary by plan (Not publicly stated).

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Mouseflow typically fits into CRO programs where insights become experiments and UX changes.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Experimentation pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Ecosystem depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 6 — Smartlook

Smartlook provides heatmaps and recordings across web and, in some setups, mobile experiences. It’s often used by UX and product teams that want visibility across multiple journeys.

Key Features

• Heatmaps for key pages and flows (Varies / N/A).
• Recordings to validate heatmap hotspots (Varies / N/A).
• Segmentation by audience and device (Varies / N/A).
• Event-style analysis patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Sharing and collaboration for investigations (Varies / N/A).
• Reporting workflows for optimization programs (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Useful for teams that want both visual behavior insight and broader investigation workflows.
• Helps connect “what users clicked” to “what happened next.”

Cons

• Governance details depend on plan and agreement (Not publicly stated).
• Deep experimentation workflows may require separate tools.

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Smartlook often sits alongside product/UX workflows where replays and heatmaps inform roadmap decisions.

• Analytics and export patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Collaboration tool pairing (Varies / N/A).
• APIs/connectors (Varies / N/A).
• Integration depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 7 — Inspectlet

Inspectlet is used by teams that want heatmaps and session-level behavior visibility for websites, especially for diagnosing conversion friction.

Key Features

• Click heatmaps (Varies / N/A).
• Scroll heatmaps (Varies / N/A).
• Filtering and segmentation patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Sharing workflows for internal review (Varies / N/A).
• Useful for landing page and funnel troubleshooting (Varies / N/A).
• Recording-style investigation patterns (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Practical for conversion troubleshooting on key pages.
• Visual evidence helps speed up stakeholder alignment.

Cons

• Ecosystem and integration details may be less transparent publicly.
• Advanced governance features require verification.

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Inspectlet typically acts as a qualitative layer alongside analytics and testing.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Experimentation pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Integration depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 8 — FullStory

FullStory is used for digital experience analysis and is often used when teams want more context-rich investigation workflows in addition to visual behavior insights.

Key Features

• Heatmap-style visualization capabilities (Varies / N/A).
• Session replay to investigate friction and confusion (Varies / N/A).
• Segmentation to compare audience behaviors (Varies / N/A).
• Search patterns to locate relevant sessions (Varies / N/A).
• Collaboration workflows to share evidence (Varies / N/A).
• Support for large-team workflows and shared investigation patterns (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Strong for cross-team investigations where context matters.
• Useful when you need richer workflows than simple CRO tools.

Cons

• Heavier than lightweight heatmap tools for basic use cases.
• Pricing and packaging vary (Varies / N/A).

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

FullStory often complements support and engineering workflows by reducing ambiguity in bug reports.

• Support workflow pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Issue workflow pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Ecosystem depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 9 — Contentsquare

Contentsquare is an enterprise-focused digital experience platform that includes heatmaps designed to help teams optimize content and conversion at scale.

Key Features

• Heatmaps for interaction and engagement patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Element-level visibility to understand what content attracts attention (Varies / N/A).
• Comparison workflows to evaluate different experiences (Varies / N/A).
• Large-scale optimization program support (Varies / N/A).
• Collaboration workflows for sharing insights internally (Varies / N/A).
• Enterprise-oriented analytics layers (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Strong for ongoing, large-scale digital optimization programs.
• Useful for teams that need structure, governance, and repeatable workflows.

Cons

• Can be more complex than SMB tools.
• Often requires dedicated ownership and rollout planning.

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Contentsquare commonly sits in an enterprise digital experience stack with analytics and optimization workflows.

• Digital analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Exports and reporting patterns (Varies / N/A).
• APIs/connectors (Varies / N/A).
• Partner ecosystem (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Tool 10 — VWO Insights

VWO Insights provides heatmaps and UX insight workflows often used by optimization teams that want their “insight layer” aligned with conversion and testing programs.

Key Features

• Click heatmaps for interaction hotspots (Varies / N/A).
• Scroll heatmaps for content placement decisions (Varies / N/A).
• Segmentation and filtering for audience comparisons (Varies / N/A).
• Sharing and collaboration workflows (Varies / N/A).
• Alignment with optimization programs and decision workflows (Varies / N/A).
• Reporting and export patterns (Varies / N/A).

Pros

• Fits CRO teams that operate with an experimentation mindset.
• Useful when you want insights organized for action, not just screenshots.

Cons

• Feature availability varies by plan (Varies / N/A).
• Security/compliance details require confirmation (Not publicly stated).

Platforms / Deployment

Web; Cloud.

Security & Compliance

Not publicly stated.

Integrations & Ecosystem

VWO Insights typically fits into experimentation and optimization ecosystems.

• Analytics pairing patterns (Varies / N/A).
• Testing and rollout workflow pairing (Varies / N/A).
• Exports/APIs (Varies / N/A).
• Ecosystem depth (Varies / N/A).

Support & Community

Varies / Not publicly stated.

---

Comparison table

Tool Name	Best For	Platform(s) Supported	Deployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)	Standout Feature	Public Rating
Hotjar	UX and CRO teams improving key pages	Web	Cloud	Fast visual heatmaps for quick insight	N/A
Microsoft Clarity	Teams wanting practical heatmaps quickly	Web	Cloud	Multiple heatmap views for rapid diagnostics	N/A
Crazy Egg	Landing pages and conversion optimization	Web	Cloud	Heatmap-first CRO workflows	N/A
Lucky Orange	SMBs wanting heatmaps plus broader UX tooling	Web	Cloud	Heatmaps combined with supporting workflows	N/A
Mouseflow	Teams wanting many heatmap types	Web	Cloud	Broad heatmap coverage plus replay patterns	N/A
Smartlook	Product and UX teams needing broader investigation	Web	Cloud	Heatmaps paired with recordings and analysis	N/A
Inspectlet	Practical qualitative insight for websites	Web	Cloud	Simple heatmaps for conversion troubleshooting	N/A
FullStory	Teams needing richer context-rich investigations	Web	Cloud	Heatmaps plus deeper experience investigation patterns	N/A
Contentsquare	Enterprise digital experience optimization	Web	Cloud	Heatmaps designed for scaled optimization programs	N/A
VWO Insights	CRO teams aligning insight to action	Web	Cloud	Insight workflows aligned with optimization	N/A

---

Evaluation and scoring of heatmap tools

Weights:

• Core features – 25%
• Ease of use – 15%
• Integrations and ecosystem – 15%
• Security and compliance – 10%
• Performance and reliability – 10%
• Support and community – 10%
• Price and value – 15%

Tool Name	Core (25%)	Ease (15%)	Integrations (15%)	Security (10%)	Performance (10%)	Support (10%)	Value (15%)	Weighted Total (0–10)
Hotjar	8	9	7	6	7	7	8	7.65
Microsoft Clarity	7	9	5	5	7	6	9	7.20
Crazy Egg	8	8	6	6	7	7	7	7.10
Lucky Orange	8	8	6	6	7	7	8	7.25
Mouseflow	8	8	7	6	7	7	7	7.20
Smartlook	8	7	7	6	7	7	7	7.10
Inspectlet	7	7	6	6	7	6	7	6.70
FullStory	9	7	8	7	8	7	6	7.55
Contentsquare	9	6	8	7	8	7	5	7.20
VWO Insights	8	7	7	6	7	7	6	6.95

How to interpret the scores:

• Use weighted totals to shortlist, then validate with a pilot on one high-impact page or funnel.
• If you prioritize ease and quick wins, ease and value matter more than maximum feature depth.
• If you prioritize enterprise rollout, integrations, governance, and reliability should carry more weight.
• If you need heatmaps tied to deeper investigation, tools that pair heatmaps with replay can reduce guesswork.
• Adjust weights to match your needs, especially privacy and cost drivers.

---

Which heatmap tool is right for you?

Solo / Freelancer

Choose a tool with fast setup and simple reporting so you can deliver insights quickly. Heatmaps work best when you pair them with a clear question and a concrete recommendation.

SMB

SMBs should prioritize ease of use, click + scroll heatmaps, and workflows that turn insight into action. Many SMBs also benefit from tools that bundle recordings and basic funnels so the team doesn’t need multiple products immediately.

Mid-Market

Mid-market teams should evaluate segmentation depth, collaboration workflows, and integration fit with analytics and experimentation. If multiple teams use the tool, governance becomes important.

Enterprise

Enterprises should prioritize governance, data controls, consistency across many sites/properties, and integration with analytics and monitoring stacks. You’ll get better outcomes with a defined operating model (ownership, review cadence, and an action pipeline).

Budget vs premium

If budget is tight, focus on tools that deliver fast insight with minimal overhead. If budget allows, pay for scalability: segmentation, governance, collaboration workflows, and integration depth reduce long-term friction.

Feature depth vs ease of use

Some tools are intentionally simple for rapid insight, while others support deeper analysis and larger rollouts. Pick the tool your team will actually use consistently.

Integrations and scalability

If heatmap insights must feed experiments, tickets, and dashboards, integration fit matters as much as heatmap quality. Consider how you will move from observation to action without manual copy-paste.

Security and compliance needs

Define masking rules, roles, retention, and internal review before scaling. If you handle sensitive data, treat heatmaps and recordings as controlled assets and verify what is captured and who can access it.

---

Frequently asked questions

FAQ 1 — What do heatmaps measure?

Heatmaps visualize aggregated interaction signals such as clicks/taps and scroll depth. They show patterns, not intent, so they should be paired with other evidence.

FAQ 2 — Are heatmaps enough to decide what to change?

Heatmaps help you identify opportunities and problems, but they don’t prove causality. Use heatmaps to form hypotheses, then validate changes through experiments or controlled rollouts.

FAQ 3 — How much traffic do I need?

It depends on segmentation. Broad patterns can emerge with smaller volumes, but segmented insights need more sessions per segment to be reliable.

FAQ 4 — Why do users click non-clickable elements?

Usually because the element looks interactive, is close to interactive content, or resembles a button. Heatmaps help reveal these misleading affordances.

FAQ 5 — How do I use scroll heatmaps well?

Scroll heatmaps help you place critical content where users actually reach. If most users don’t scroll far, move key content up or improve the page’s “reason to scroll.”

FAQ 6 — How do we handle privacy?

Use masking and exclusion rules, limit access by role, and set retention policies. Treat behavior data as sensitive and establish governance before scaling.

FAQ 7 — Why do heatmaps look inconsistent sometimes?

Traffic sources, device mix, page variants, and dynamic content can shift patterns. Compare like-for-like segments and ensure you’re analyzing the correct page versions.

FAQ 8 — Should I run heatmaps on every page?

Start with high-impact pages: landing pages, pricing, signup, checkout, and key help pages. Expand coverage after you establish a repeatable process.

FAQ 9 — How do I turn insights into action?

Use a simple pipeline: observation → hypothesis → proposed change → validation plan → measurement. Assign owners so insights become shipped improvements.

FAQ 10 — What’s the best pilot approach?

Choose one critical page, define success metrics, run long enough to gather stable patterns, then implement a small set of changes and validate with measurement.

---

Conclusion

Heatmap tools help you see how users interact with pages so you can spot friction, validate design assumptions, and prioritize improvements with real evidence. The right tool depends on your team maturity, privacy requirements, and how deeply you want to connect heatmaps to analytics and experimentation. Shortlist two or three tools from the list above, run a pilot on a high-impact page like pricing, signup, or checkout, and evaluate setup effort, segmentation usefulness, governance controls, and the clarity of insights before scaling.